Mukesh Khanna asks why Saif Ali Khan played Raavan in Adipurush: ‘Isn’t there a superior entertainer in the business?’

Mukesh Khanna calls Adipurush an affront to Ramayan, adding that Om Raut has no information on the fanciful epic.

Mukesh Khanna has joined the detachment pummeling the most recent film Adipurush, and how it depicts characters from the Hindu fanciful incredible Ramayan. Aside from reprimanding the characterization and illegitimate depiction, the veteran entertainer likewise took digs at Saif Ali Khan for his efforts to turn Lankesh, in view of Raavan, into a comic person.

In another video that he shared, Mukesh said, “Raavan might be frightening, yet how could seem to be Chandrakanta’s Shivdutt – vishpurush? He was a pandit. You will be stunned how might somebody envision and plan Raavan as such. I recollect when the film was declared, Saif had said he’ll make the person humourous. I had expressed then also – ‘Who on earth are you to change characters of our epic, apne dharam me kar ke dikhao. Sir katne lagenge (you will be decapitated)’. The truth of the matter is, very little difference in Raavan’s look and the producers even attempted to cause him to do satire.”

He added, “Om Raut ko Raavan ke liye sirf Saif Ali Khan mila? Isase uncha character industry me rah nahi gaya kya? Raavan kaddavar tha, isko jugaad se banaya. Raavan kam sasta dealer zyada dikhta hai (Couldn’t Om Raut track down a preferred entertainer over Saif Ali Khan? This one seems to be Raavan and more like a modest runner).”

adipurushMukesh likewise said that Lanka in Ramayan should be made of gold while Adipurush shows a shutdown of Lanka. He added that even the fights displayed in the film seemed to fight from the period and more like area battles of today, brimming with curses and harmful language.

‘Adipurush is an affront to Ramayan’
Mukesh began his video by calling Adipurush an affront to Ramayan. “I as a rule don’t discuss films, yet this is connected with my confidence. I have perused the responses of individuals. One individual, the present youth, said ‘mazaa aya, parody tha accha (It was fun, satire film)’. I was like ‘How might Ramayan be parody?’ So I chose to investigate, and when I explored, I understood isase bada bhayanak tamasha nahi ho sakta, isase bada apmaan nahi ho sakta humare Ramayan ka (There can be no more terrible show than the film, and no greater affront to Ramayan than Adipurush).”

He likewise said that author Manoj Muntashir Shukla made Ramayan “Kalyugi” with his exchanges that utilized “tapori language”.

Leave a Comment